Guns on display at Dicks Sporting Goods / Photo by Sean on Flickr

The gun grabbers are back at it again, this time they are aiming to secure a federal “Gun Safety” board. 

Gun safety is a truly distorted term at this point and time, it is as if we live in two separate countries when it comes to language like this. When gun owners use the term “Gun Safety” we are referring to several precautions you take when handling firearms(treat guns as if they are loaded, keep guns pointed in a safe direction, wear eyes and ears, and so on.) When the gun grabbers talk about gun safety they are referring to any number of anti-2A policy proposals that all work towards crushing the rights of gun owners. 

This move for a “Gun Safety” board at the federal level, is not going to be an institution that will look to educate the public on wearing your hearing and eye protection, this board will be a gun control driven policy institute financed by the American taxpayer. 

The board is being proposed by California Democrat Mark DeSaulnier who has put forward a bill that seeks to “combat our nation’s gun violence epidemic through evidence-based, scientific solutions.” For reference, DeSaulnier is a long-time gun control advocate who comes from one of the least free states in the union. DeSaulnier also has an “F” rating from the NRA, something he frequently boasts about on the campaign trail and on socials. 

If this legislation were to pass, the board would be operating under the Department of Health and Human Services(HHS.) The HHS is currently run by Xavier Becerra, another long-time gun control advocate and former Attorney General of California. Becerra made national headlines while California AG when he sued the ATF. Why did a Democrat gun-grabber sue the ATF? Becerra did not think that the ATF was moving fast enough while moving to ban 80% lowers. 

This board could be catastrophic long term, it could fuel debate with misleading statistics about “gun deaths” and “gun violence.” This board could also give the ATF and other agencies an excuse to push more regulation on an already over-regulated industry.

For future reference; the bill is H.R. 5273 and is being referred to as the Gun Safety Board and Research Act.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AK Johnny 1
AK Johnny 1
2 months ago

Haha! 😁
These lefties are lunatics. Good luck getting ANY gun owner in America nowadays, to comply with new bogus gun regulation. Especially after watching the abuse in Australia and New Zealand…
The language of the 2A is ironclad and legally impenetrable. THAT is what pisses the left off the most! Distrust of the federal govt is at an all time high. This would be the DUMBEST time in history to attempt to impose anti 2A imposition.

John
John
2 months ago
Reply to  AK Johnny 1

I think it would be the BEST time for those retards to do it. I believe that could be the tipping point that would finally kick off the next Civil War. This country needs a cleansing. Marxist politicians will never be voted out of office, now that they have the election rigging system in full working order, so the only other option is to “remove” them from office permanently. While we’re at it, we could also remove any Antifa scum from society, too. Antifa only exists because ZOG-controlled pigs protect them.

ELLOYD_TUNT
2 months ago

California is referred to as ‘The Land of Fruits & Nuts’ for a reason. I keep wishing that the Sci-Fi flick “San Andreas” would become a reality. Wishful thinking on my part.

Proud Vet
2 months ago

The communist a.k.a. Democrat party has been trying to disarm the American people since at least Franklin Roosevelt. They’re out in the open they’re not hiding as you can see what’s going on especially right now in Australia that used to be a calm quiet nation now is attacking at citizens with police who were supposed to be protecting the people, by beating them and everything else to make him take the jab! Now what do you think that’s about, forcing people to do something or put something in your body that has never been proven that being the so-called vaccine or the so-called cornova 19! These people do not care about saving lives this is about destroying lives, if the truth was let out which they suppress you would find out how many people are dying and being named with this killing drug that the one world order bunny like Gates has been sponsoring.

Larry Dickman
Larry Dickman
2 months ago

The Democrat Communists desperately need to dis-arm us because they know that eventually the firearms will be used against THEM, just as they were used against the British in 1776-1783.

Timothy
Timothy
2 months ago
Reply to  Larry Dickman

and those who after 1965 couldn’t shoot Southerners, went out west to kill the Plains Indians. Later these yankees enslaved their own children in sweatshops for 10-12-14 hour days, thus bringing about another great bit of socialism…..unions. Death to Amerika !

Fed Up With the Sell-Out
Fed Up With the Sell-Out
2 months ago
Reply to  Timothy

Your knowledge of actual history is a JOKE!!! LOLOLOL

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
2 months ago

To take guns away “scam:” front

Fed Up With the Sell-Out
Fed Up With the Sell-Out
2 months ago

“Gun Safety” board? LOLOLOLOL!!! Perhaps the DEMOCRATS should start in such places as Chicago and Kabul where their agenda has caused massive gun violence issues. Yup, send in the “board” and a platoon of Social Workers and everything will be fine. You do, of course, know that the first recommendation of the “Gun Safety Board” will be to disarm and defund the police and military, don’t you?

That way the criminals and Chinese won’t have to fire a shot when they march into Washington to take over.

Timothy
Timothy
2 months ago

judges that let loose the thugs and the thugs that write the laws should be held accountable. They use to work for “We the People” but Abe Lincoln changed all that!

BrewDubbs
BrewDubbs
2 months ago

I am very glad to see the increase in first time gun owners. I only hope they are legal purchases, not for illegal use or sale.

With the increase in recent times, it is easy to see that people are going to buck any type of control, other than two hands for targets….

Gene Ralno
Gene Ralno
2 months ago

I’ll just paraphrase a prior comment I’ve written a few times in the past. Generally, it applies the term “safety” in lieu of “violence” in common phrases. Gun safety is becoming another go-to term for grabbers and confiscators. It’s brilliant for public relations and incendiary to owners of firearms. Safety is a quality made possible by people and actions, not objects. The term is wrong in many ways, but psychologically, it is powerful.

Although use of the term is clever, members of the government party (democrats) cannot grasp the fact that criminals don’t ask government’s permission to use or even possess a firearm. Nevertheless, “gun safety” is becoming a mainstay of the government party (democrats) flimflam because it narrows the focus to fit the objective. The objective of course is to disarm the American public. 

Ask yourself why the government party (democrats) doesn’t focus on just safety instead of gun safety. Fact is they’re after guns, not safety. They couldn’t care less about the entire field of safety because it commingles criminals with peaceable, lawful citizens and deflects from their intended focus on peaceable, lawful citizens.

The government party (democrats) hopes to transform arms owners into dependents. Once they’re dependent on the government, the government party will choose which of them they’ll allow to own arms. Unfortunately, that privilege will be reserved for the government party (democrats).

The government party (democrats) wants citizens to believe making the U.S. safer for criminals will make it safer for their victims. Ask yourself, do you believe being disarmed makes you safer? What kind of political leader would disarm his people while howling about the peril they face?

Dennis partlow
Dennis partlow
2 months ago

The 2nd amendment Restricts Government, the technology of the firearm is irrelevant!!

Gene Ralno
Gene Ralno
1 month ago

Use of the term “gun safety” is part of the socialist flimflam because it narrows the focus to fit the objective. The objective of course is to disarm the American public. No? Then ask yourself why the People’s Democrat Party doesn’t focus on just safety instead of gun safety. Fact is they’re after guns, not safety.

They couldn’t care less about the entire field of safety because it commingles too many hazards with peaceable, lawful citizens and deflects the focus on citizens. Socialists hope to transform firearms owners into dependents. Once they’re dependent on the government, the party will choose which of them it will allow to own firearms. 

Democrats want citizens to believe making the U.S. safer for criminals will make it safer for their victims. Ask yourself, do you believe being disarmed makes you safer? What kind of political leader would disarm his people while howling about the peril they face?

Arjay
Arjay
1 month ago

To the gun grabbers, “gun safety” translates to “NO GUNS ALLOWED BY ANYONE”!

Just me
Just me
1 month ago
Reply to  Arjay

Slight correction – it means no guns for you, but their henchmen will be authorized to carry any weapon they choose to protect the elites. Welcome to the Fourth Reich Amerika.

You may also like