RoFra via Wikimedia Commons

In the United States, where the Constitution is — or is supposed to be — the supreme law of the land, two things are true. Police, tasked with upholding the law, have the right to do what is necessary to secure control of a situation in order to protect themselves and others. Equally important, however, is that police officers afford due recognition of and respect for the fundamental, natural right of the citizenry to keep and bear arms at home and outside the home. 

Balancing these rights and responsibilities is not always easy, especially in times of unrest and, as now, when increasing gun control is placing additional obstacles in the way.

Ideally, when these two truths come to a head, the situation is resolved peaceably and without altercation, which is how the vast majority of cases are resolved. Unfortunately, when the situation falls short of this ideal, the result can be injury or death to citizens and at times to police officers themselves. Worse still, such tragic outcomes are increasingly common as gun rights in America are put to the test like never before. For the sake of the nation, the lives of our brave men and women in blue, and the future of gun rights in America, it is imperative that the police and Second Amendment citizens must work together to reverse this unsettling trend.

Although Second Amendment conservatives and racial justice activists rarely see eye-to-eye, not least of all because of the outright anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter, recent incidents that have stoked the anger of these groups should also cause conservatives generally to pause and pay attention to what is going on. 

Behind the click-bait headlines and incessant anti-gun progressive propaganda, the deaths of black citizens like Breonna Taylor, Corey Jones, and Philando Castile highlight the tragic consequences when the give-and-take of Second Amendment rights versus the duties of police becomes unbalanced. 

Taylor died last March during a botched police raid that unfolded under questionable circumstances as police returned fire to a single shot fired by Taylor’s boyfriend from inside the apartment, who thought their apartment was being broken into and robbed. 

Jones was a concealed weapons permit holder shot by a plainclothes police officer who approached him from an unmarked vehicle while Jones waited on the side of the road for a tow truck late at night. Castile happened to be driving a vehicle stopped by police and was inexplicably shot by officers after calmly notifying them that he was lawfully carrying a firearm.

While these are extreme examples, and all involved questionable police officer conduct that fell short of the overall high standards demanded of law enforcement, they demonstrate what can happen in the absence of sound training and proper respect for citizens’ rights to keep and bear arms. 

To be sure, police officers in general still reflect robust respect for the Second Amendment. However, particularly in more urban areas where far-Left activists have either been elected sheriff or have risen to leadership posts in police departments, results can be very different. This makes sound police training for encounters with armed citizens even more critical; importantly, this training should include focusing on plainly and unambiguously directing citizens how to safely secure their firearms during an encounter.  

Also, however, citizens must be respectful of, and toward police officers. To this end, there must be immediate and absolute compliance in following their precise instructions. Even if a citizen believes he or she is in the right, the time for protest comes after the situation is de-escalated, not during.

When police and citizens treat each other with respect and understanding, there is no reason for violent escalation. However, if ambiguity, disrespect, mistake, or criminal action – by either side – disturbs the critical balance, the outcome can be, as we have recently seen, tragic. Although the radical gun control proposed by Democrats have placed a strain on this relationship, police and Second Amendment citizens need never forget they are natural allies in the fight for public safety and for Second Amendment rights. 

Bob Barr represented Georgia’s Seventh District in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003. He served as the United States Attorney in Atlanta from 1986 to 1990 and was an official with the CIA in the 1970s. He now practices law in Atlanta, Georgia and serves as head of Liberty Guard.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

Bob Barr

Bob Barr represented Georgia's Seventh District in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003. He served as the United States Attorney in Atlanta from 1986 to 1990 and was an official with the CIA in the 1970s.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
19 days ago

There is no way we could have enough cops to keep order without armed citizens

Stephen Weiss
18 days ago

sensible analysis, and was worth reading.

18 days ago

This articles brilliantly written. I am from an earlier generation where we respected and counted on our police to be the utmost of caring and bravery to protctect us. We said yes sir and thank to them. Now it is completely different. It has evolved to a very dangerous state for citizens and police alike. Police have been told to ‘stand down” and allow crimes to be committed right in front of their eyes and must watch without stepping in. Police have been sued and defunded and not supported. How are police to respond as they were trained in a sanctuary city or a city that does not support their arrests by practicing a “no bail” practice of what I call idiot departments. Threats are always being threatened with taking away the 2nd Amendment and all kind of laws to change our rights under the Constitution. Who wants to take our weapons? The people who want all the power over us and yet they have security hired or provided to them. It is not law abiding citizens who are abusing our rights by the 2nd Amendment. Alot of people would stand directly beside a police officer if necessary in extreme cases. They respect and are very supportive and grateful for our men in Blue and their service. Their families are part of that service and we respect them. The criminals will always find a way to get weapons and continue to commit crimes. It is only the general public with defunding police, taking fire arms, and not supporting our police to be able to defend and comply with our laws that will be harmed. Knock off the ridiculous anti Constitution crap, support our laws and our police. Our Constitution is there for a reason and works. Our country to respect and return to how it used to be. Christianity, respect for the law of order etc. If that does not suit you then you may be best served in another country.

18 days ago

We must always keep in mind that the police forces will be enforcing whatever laws or policies their bosses (often the mayor and city council) direct them to enforce. Thus, the police are essentially mercenaries in the employ of the elected governments. This means that they are not necessarily on the side of right or even justice. That’s why “backing the Blue” isn’t necessarily in your best interests, nor even always the “right” or morally good thing to do. It’s also why local elections are so important.

You may also like